Akin to the whole “cyclists should wear helmets, to avoid a brain injury caused by a direct hit to the head” thing, because a few stupid kids (and we’re all stupid as kids, aren’t we?) get hurt, let’s slap helmets on everyone.
Is full-body armour next? I’m surprised “safety experts” aren’t mandating that for cyclists already.
Anyhow – to avoid this post being full of just my incensed rage at a society that thinks that helmets will prevent dumb accidents on a toboggan hill (or on a bike), I went out and found some hard numbers for you:
This is from the Canadian Institute for Health Information – a very reputable source.
Traumatic head injuries were sustained during sports and recreational activities in 28% of children and youth admitted to hospital for traumatic injury, and 8% of adults. Cycling is one of the leading causes of sports and recreation–related head injury. Of the 4,605 cycling injury hospitalizations in 2003–2004, 18% were due to head injuries. The highest proportion of hospitalizations due to cycling-related head injuries was seen in children and youth (60%).
Let’s look at what is implied, but not said in the above paragraph:
- Traumatic head injuries were NOT sustained during sports and recreational activities in 72% of children and 92% of adults.
- Of 4,605 cycling injury hospitalizations in 2003-2004, 82% were NOT due to head injuries.
Oh yeah… I can’t forget this part of the study, from the same link:
Among Canadians between 20 and 39 years of age, more than half of traumatic head injuries were due to motor vehicle incidents in 2003–2004 (1,867 admissions), followed by assault and homicide, which accounted for one-fifth of cases for this age group, or 722 admissions. For Canadians between the ages of 40 and 59, motor vehicles also accounted for the largest proportion of traumatic head injuries (40% or 1,308 admissions), followed closely by falls (39% or 1,290 admissions).
The CIHI site also has some good tables and charts about this issue.
I find it interesting that only about 10% (~500 out of ~5000) of traumatic head injuries suffered by children happened while cycling – yet helmets are mandatory for them. 90% of child traumatic head injuries did NOT happen while cycling! What about the 90% of the time they aren’t on their bike and their heads get hurt? Shouldn’t they be wearing helmets then too?
There are some provincial politicians who think that helmets should be mandatory for adult cyclists too, yet only about 2.5% (~300 out of ~12,000) of traumatic head injuries suffered by adults happened while cycling. 97.5% of traumatic head injuries did NOT happen while cycling. In fact, most of them happened in motor vehicle accidents.
Why don’t people in cars wear helmets? They are MUCH more likely to hurt their heads in a car than on a bike.
Combat the hysteria with common sense and cold hard facts.
|comments powered by Disqus|